![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
Northeast POW/MIA Network Freedom Ride |
![]()
Look Who Is A POW ~ What is wrong with this picture? Look Who Is A POW - It's Manuel Noriega. Noriega received POW status, from the United States Government, in 1992, by virtue of his capture during the December 1989 US invasion of Panama. The former President of Panama and drug lord recently completed a 17 year prison sentence in the United States. Upon his release Noriega was extradited to France, where he faces new charges. The French Court also recognized Noriega's status as a Prisoner of War. |
News of POW being shown and will see what is said. So far "Captured Soldier". If only we could care about him just half as much as the Father trying to get his son back from Brazil. Wish this Son in Afghanistan could mean as much ~ Bob Jones Family pleas for captive US soldier's releaseThe Taliban released a video Friday of an American soldier captured in Afghanistan, showing him apparently healthy but spouting criticism about the U.S. military operation. In Idaho, Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl's family pleaded on Christmas Day for his release and urged him to "stay strong." Bergdahl disappeared June 30 while based in eastern Afghanistan and is the only known American serviceman in captivity. The Taliban claimed his capture in a video released in mid-July that showed the young Idaho soldier appearing downcast and frightened. He hadn't been heard from until Friday's video, in which he looks well and speaks clearly. Lt. Col. Tim Marsano of the Idaho National Guard issued a statement Friday from the family of Bergdahl, who live outside Hailey, Idaho. In their statement, the family urged the captors "to let our only son come home." And to their son, the family said, "We love you and we believe in you. Stay strong." Bob Sen. Gregg ~ Concord - 225-7115 Sen. Shaheen ~ 657-7500 Rep. Shea-Porter ~ 641-9546 Rep. Hodes ~ 223-9814 |
A review of the entire directive finds that the phrase Prisoner or War or the acronym POW is never used. The fact that the terminology Prisoner of War is no longer used was confirmed by Secretary of the Navy Gordon R. England. In his 11 October 2002 memo announcing the change in status of Capt. Michael Scott Speicher from Missing In Action to Missing/Captured, Secretary England stated: "Although the controlling missing persons statute and directives do not use the term "Prisoner of War," the fact supporting a change in Captain Speicher's category from Missing in Action to Missing/Captured would also support the conclusion that, if alive, he is a Prisoner of War." If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, call it a duck. If an American service member is captured by hostile forces he or she is a Prisoner of War. Why not designate them as such? The phrase Prisoner of War says two thing. First it says Prisoner - living breathing human being. Second it says held by the enemy. Prisoner of War is a phrase that inflames. America does not leave its servicemen, its Prisoners behind. We don't leave POWs behind. At least that is what they'd like us to believe. We know differently. Visit Terminology to learn more. Why wasn't Matt Maupin listed as a POW??? read the article written by Ted Sampley in 2006. Why our POWs were Declared KIA ~ Breach of Trust: POWs are left behind Text of The Quang or '1205' Document ~ Handwritten note on cover memo from Pyotr Ivashutin, head of Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) states..... Last known Alive POWs ~ Defense Intelligence Agency List of "Last Known Alive" February 7, 1996 Kremlin Withholds Report on POWs ~ American's Taken to Russia During the 1960s? Thank you POW/MIA Freedom Fighters for these links. |
![]()
Presidents Page |
||
This is an exceptional book. Please obtain and read ~ Is Anybody Listening?
Because of our war on terrorism and our involvement in Iraq, |
![]()
Call To Action!Help Us Pass H.Res 111The following organizations support passage of H. Res 111 the Korea-Cold War Families of the Missing, World War II Families for Return of the Missing, Co-Sponsors to Date -- 249 .Res 111 - "That there is established in the House of Representatives a select committee to be known as the Select Committee on POW and MIA Affairs." "The select committee shall conduct a full investigation of all unresolved matters relating to any United States personnel unaccounted for from the Vietnam era, the Korean conflict, World War II, Cold War Missions, Persian Gulf War, Operation Iraqi Freedom, or Operation Enduring Freedom, including MIA's and POW's missing and captured." The Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs concluded in 1993 that; "There is evidence, moreover, that indicates the possibility of survival, at least for a small number, after Operation Homecoming...." Much new information has surfaced regarding the mis-handling and suppression of POW/MIA information. A former analyst with the Defense POW/MIA Office, provided this information along with many other disturbing details requiring Congressional attention. Specifically, he detailed a report referred to, in house, as the "185 Report," This report discussed the possibility that as many as 185 American POWs were alive as late as 1976. During the same time frame the Joint Casualty Resolution Center (JCRC)concluded their own study. They found the possibility existed that as many as 57 American servicemen might be alive. In the fall of 2008, we learned that investigators for the Senate Committee compiled a list of 59 names representing the "small number" the committee evidence "idicates he possibility of survival." Investigators also stated they represented the "minimum number" of POWs. Isn't it time we find out what happened to that "small number" and address the "unresolved matters" relating to our POW/MIAs. In March 2006, memos written by a former Defense Intelligence analyst while serving as an investigator with the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs were discovered. These memos detailed the Vietnamese admission that some 19 servicemen listed as died while missing were in fact captured. These servicemen survived for varying lengths of time, one by Vietnamese admission survived three years. The committee never addressed this matter. In an interesting side note, 10 of the nineteen servicemen Vietnamese official acknowledged "survived into captivity" are among the 57 our own (JCRC)concluded might still be alive. In February of 2005, the Joint Commission Support Directorate, the investigative arm of the U.S./Russian Joint POW/MIA Commission concluded; "Americans, including American servicemen, were imprisoned in the Soviet Union." This is but the tip of the iceberg, requiring congressional attention. It is time to address the volumes of new information available on POW/MIA matters from World War II, Korea, Cold War, Vietnam and the Gulf. We ask you all to contact your congressional representatives and request that they co-sponsor H.Res 111. We've posted a list of all 435 congressional representatives on our web site, along their phone and fax numbers. You can even email your Congressional Representative directly from the site. There is a sample letter. Use it, as is, alter it to make it more personal, or write your own letter. It's time for Congress to take another look at the POW/MIA issue. Make sure you contact your congressional representative, asking them to co-sponsor H.Res 111. Carol Shea-Porter (D - 01) has signed on in support Paul Hodes, II (D - 02) has signed on in support |
![]()
National Alliance of Families
For the Return of World War II – Korea – Cold War – Vietnam – Gulf Wars Dolores Alfond ~ 425-881-1499 Lynn O’Shea ~ 718-846-4350 Web Site ~ www.nationalalliance.org Email ------ lynn@nationalalliance.org May 3, 2008 ~ Bits N Pieces The POW Status -- When Matt Maupin was buried among the honors bestowed was the awarding of his medals. These medals included the Purple Heart and the POW Medal. Isn’t it ironic that a captured serviceman, returned under his country’s flag is now designated a POW, by our government. Yet, our government denies that same individual a POW status when it is needed most, when he is in enemy hands. We recognize this enemy, like the Viet Cong before them, does not adhere to the Geneva Conventions. However, the designation of captured American service members as POW tells the world the value we place on our personnel and tells the enemy how we expect these men and women to be treated. The designation POW paints a picture. It clearly states a service member is in enemy hands. Missing/Captured is ambiguous. There was no ambiguity to Maupin’s status; he was a POW under the Geneva Conventions. Had this been the Vietnam War, under the same circumstances, Maupin would have been designated a POW. We’ve proven that, over and over again. The public understands the POW designation. A Missing/Captured designation is a question mark. Clearly, in the case of Matt Maupin there is no question. Yet, sadly our government refused to provide Maupin the moral protection a POW designation provides. In our March 15th newsletter, we related two incidents, one involving the media the other personal, that illustrated the general public’s lack of awareness regarding service members captured in Iraq. That’s what the Missing/Captured designation does. It misleads the American public. |
![]()
![]()
|
This site updated:
July 29, 2010
|